Defeat in Victory?

Thursday, November 6, 2008 \PM\.\Thu\.

As was stated in the movie The Untouchables, “We laugh because it’s funny, and we laugh because it’s true. ” Courtesy of the Onion with a salute to Rick Lugari who brought it to my attention.


While some herald a new era for “reproductive rights”; a Catholic for Obama muses: “was it ever about abortion?”

Thursday, November 6, 2008 \PM\.\Thu\.

It’s a new day in America, and people are celebrating the rise of a staunchly “pro-choice” president unwavering in his support of Roe v. Wade and dedicated to expanding universal access to abortion.

Read the rest of this entry »


Douthat Puts Kmiec in His Place

Thursday, November 6, 2008 \PM\.\Thu\.

Many of us on the conservative side of the spectrum have been sounding a tad cranky the last couple days.  Still, occasionally this frustration is channeled into well deserved directions.  Commenter and fellow Steubenville alumnus FUS01 pointed me towards a great piece by Ross Douthat, part of an open discussion on the future of the GOP over on Slate.  In response to Kmiec’s now familiar comlaint that GOP pro-lifers are unrealistic in wanting to defeat Roe, and his claim that Obama is a natural for pro-life voters, Douthat dishes it out to him in a way that Kmiec richely deserves:

Read the rest of this entry »


America’s First Secular President?

Thursday, November 6, 2008 \PM\.\Thu\.

president-elect-obama

 

Damian Thompson from the Holy Smoke blog in London’s Daily Telegraph newspaper has declared Barack Obama as America’s first secular president.  Not far from being the truth some would say that Bill Clinton was pretty secular as well.  But I believe the point that Mr. Thompson was attempting to get across was the simple fact that the majority of church-going Christians voted for Senator McCain than did Senator Obama.  What is more revealing is that ‘Christians in name only’ voted overwhelmingly for Senator Obama.

The breakdown of voting figures in the US election indicates an extraordinary gulf between churchgoing and non-churchgoing voters. Barack Obama hoovered up the votes of non-churchgoers to an unprecedented extent: 65 per cent of them voted for him. I’ve thought for a long time that American agnostics and atheists are a growing force, under-represented in opinion polls. Obama will be their president.

 

He’ll also be the president of non-practising Catholics who, according to Beliefnet figures, voted 61 to 37 per cent for Obama. That’s no surprise: the Democrats were always the party of Catholics.

 

Read the rest of this entry »


Obama Broken Promises, A Continuing Series

Thursday, November 6, 2008 \AM\.\Thu\.

crying-jackass

Shazam, as Gomer Pyle used to say in the Sixties!  The Iraqi government claims that Senator Obama has reassured them that he will not precipitously withdraw troops from Iraq, and it appears that the end of 2011 might be a target date.  To my anti-war friends on the Left I suggest that if I were in your shoes I would not hold my breath about US troops being removed from Iraq even before the 2012 election.  You were useful to Obama to win this election, but you will be of little use to him now that he is President.


The Road Back

Thursday, November 6, 2008 \AM\.\Thu\.

mccotter

After any great political defeat it is essential for members of that party to debate what went wrong and how the party can prevail in the future.  Representative Thaddeus G. McCotter has made a good start with this essay in the American Spectator.

Read the rest of this entry »


Election 2008 – Perspectives from Rome & the USCCB

Thursday, November 6, 2008 \AM\.\Thu\.

Pope Benedict, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and a dean from the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical University weigh in on the results of the election.

Read the rest of this entry »