Thursday, May 27, 2010 \AM\.\Thu\.

1600 words.
Sigh. I hate this. I really do. I was going to write more about populism, but a recent angry outburst directed at me prompted this instead.
I hate having to clarify a position that will likely cause at least some people who agree with me on 95% of issues to become my embittered, mortal enemies over the remaining 5%. But I’m just the sort of guy who must perpetually set the record straight. Don’t blame me, blame my personality.
I agree with Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan on American foreign policy. So do a lot of the troops, by the way – the people who actually have to fight America’s wars gave more money to Ron Paul than to any other GOP candidate during the 2007-08 primaries (please don’t listen to people who factor in McCain’s contributions after April of ’08, when Paul withdrew from the race).
This is to say, I support an non-interventionist (not “isolationist”) foreign policy. I will give you four reasons why.
Read the rest and comment here.
Comments Off on Uncle Leo and the Neocons |
Uncategorized | Tagged: American Foreign Policy, George W. Bush, Imperialism, Iraq War, Leo Strauss, Neoconservatism, Neoliberalism, Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul |
Permalink
Posted by Bonchamps
Monday, December 14, 2009 \PM\.\Mon\.
I’ve written about this before, but it’s nice to see Daniel Larison making the point with characteristic clarity in an interview with The Economist:
Iraq was also the policy that turned the public so sharply against President Bush prior to the 2006 mid-term elections, and those elections were and were correctly seen as a rejection of the war and Mr Bush’s handling of it. The war was the main issue of those elections, and the GOP lost control of Congress because it had identified itself completely with the war and its members in Congress continued to be its most vocal defenders. By national-security conservatives, I mean those members of the conservative movement who have a primary and overriding focus on foreign policy and national-security questions, and who typically take extremely hawkish positions. They were the leading advocates and cheerleaders for the invasion. Most movement conservatives supported the policy, but it was the national-security conservatives who drove the party into the ditch while the others went along for the ride.
Read the rest of this entry »
14 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Daniel Larison, George W. Bush, Iraq War, Party Politics, Political Debate, Republicans, U.S. Congress |
Permalink
Posted by John Henry
Friday, November 27, 2009 \AM\.\Fri\.
Ed Stoddard of Reuters’ religion blog Faithworld carries a roundup of the skirmish between Congressman Patrick Kennedy, the son of the late Senator Edward Kennedy, has claimed that Rhode Island Bishop Thomas Tobin.
In conclusion, Stoddard asks:
This leads to a question about the consistency of views in the U.S. Catholic Church leadership. The Church opposes abortion and therefore liberal politicians who support abortion rights risk being refused communion. The Church supports a healthcare overhaul that would make the system more equitable. So does a conservative Catholic politician who opposes this reform risk being denied communion for ignoring the Catholic social teaching that justifies it?
How about support for capital punishment, which the Vatican says is unjustified in almost all possible cases, or for war? In the build-up to the Iraq war, Pope John Paul was so opposed to the plan that he sent a personal envoy to Washington to argue against it. Did bishops threaten any measures against Catholic politicians who energetically supported that war despite Vatican opposition?
The author’s questions reveal an elementary ignorance concerning the moral issues in question and their relationship to varying levels of Church teaching. While I am disappointed by his answer (Faithworld is generally one of the better and more educational “religion blogs” in the secular media), it is understandable — as even many Catholics find themselves confused on this matter. Read the rest of this entry »
33 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Abortion, Bishop Thomas J. Tobin, Canon 915, Capital Punishment, Catechism of the Catholic Church, Ed Stoddard, Excommunication, Faithworld, Fifth Commandment, Health Care Debate, Intrinsic Evil, Iraq War, Just War Doctrine, Legitimate Defense, Patrick Kennedy, Pope John Paul II, Prudential Judgment, Reception of Holy Communion, Reuters, USCCB |
Permalink
Posted by Christopher Blosser
Friday, May 22, 2009 \PM\.\Fri\.
It has become an oft repeated trope of Catholics who are on the left or the self-consciously-unclassifiable portions of the American political spectrum that the pro-life movement has suffered a catastrophic loss of credibility because of its association with the Republican Party, and thence with the Iraq War and the use of torture on Al Qaeda detainees. Until the pro-life movement distances itself from the Republican Party and all of the pro-life leadership who have defended the Iraq War and/or the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” on detainees, the argument goes, the pro-life movement will have no moral authority and will be the laughing stock of enlightened Catholics everywhere.
Regardless of what one thinks about the Iraq War and torture (myself, I continue to support the former but oppose the latter) I’m not sure that this claim works very well. Further, I think that those who make it often fail to recognize the extent to which it cuts both ways.
Read the rest of this entry »
42 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Abortion, Capital Punishment, Culture of Death, Culture of Life, Death Penalty, Elizabeth Anscombe, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Enhanced Interrogation Techniques, ESCR, Euthanasia, Freedom of Speech, Health Care, Immigration, Iraq War, Marriage, Political Philosophy, Political Rhetoric, Political Structures, Politics, Pornography, Pro-Family, Pro-Life, Sanctity of Life, School Vouchers, Sex Education, Torture, Traditional Family |
Permalink
Posted by DarwinCatholic