Sunday, October 3, 2010 \PM\.\Sun\.
In discourse in the Catholic blogosphere in the last two years, it has become increasingly evident that Catholics grossly misunderstand the infallibility of our holy ecumenical Pontiff, presently, Benedict XVI, pope of Rome, and the universal Magisterium. This point of clarification is, to be honest, in response to a dispute on another column that began with the claim that “an encyclical is not dogma.”
Following the First Vatican Council, a number of Catholic theologians oversimplified the dogma of papal infallibility due to Orthodox and Protestant criticisms. The unfortunate result is that it has given rise to a flawed understanding of the dogma promulgated by the Council. The most prevalent, profoundly erroneous practice has been to view the dogma of papal infallibility as a formula, which severely misunderstands the teaching of Vatican I.
This is most obvious in a number of myths surrounding the dogma that are unfortunately still taught to some Catholics. For example, to exercise papal infallibility, the Holy Father does not have to be actually seated on the Papal Throne, nor does the ecumenical Pontiff have to explicitly cite the fact that he is invoking infallibility, and neither does the Bishop of Rome have to be issuing a dogma or doctrinal definition for his words to be infallible and therefore binding on all the faithful.
Read the rest of this entry »
20 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Catholic Theology, Ecclesiology, Magisterium, Papal Infallibility |
Permalink
Posted by Eric Brown
Friday, July 30, 2010 \AM\.\Fri\.
This article originally appeared on The New Theological Movement written by Reginaldus on July 29, 2010 Anno Domini. Re-posted with permission.
18th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Luke 12:13-21
The rich man of this Sunday’s Gospel is blessed with a bountiful harvest. Rather than thanking God for this gift, he hoards the grain in his barns – his heart is possessed by his possessions. At the moment of death, the Lord calls him a fool, for he was not rich in what matters to God.
The Fathers of the Church, and St. Thomas Aquinas following them, see in this parable a strong teaching of social justice. Their teachings have in turn been integrated into the Social Doctrine of the Church. Here we will consider St. Thomas’ exposition of the doctrine as well as several important quotations from the Church Fathers.
The common destination of all goods and right to private property
We must first affirm that man has a right to own private property. All men have a natural right to make use of material goods. According to positive human law, men also have a right to private property – this is necessary for the good order of society and the proper care of the goods themselves, it also serves as a means of restraining greed and inciting toward generosity (a man can give alms only if he has some property of his own).
However, it is equally clear in the Church’s Tradition, as expressed by the Fathers of the Church and magisterial teachings, that the right to private property is subordinate to the universal destination of all goods. That is, the right to private property cannot be extended to the point of depriving others of the basic material necessities of life. Every man has the right to the material necessities of life – when he is deprived of these, while another has excess wealth, a grave injustice has occurred.
Read the rest of this entry »
7 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Catechism of the Catholic Church, Catena Aurea, Catholic Social Doctrine, Centesimus Annus, Church Fathers, Common Good, De Nabuthe, Gaudium et Spes, Good Order of Sociey, Greed, Holy Bible, Holy Gospel of Saint Luke, Magisterium, Natural Rights, Poor and Vulnerable, Pope John Paul II, Pope Leo XIII, Pope Paul VI, Pope Pius XI, Pope Saint Gregory the Great, Populorum Progressio, Positive Human Law, Poverty, Private Property, Quadragesimo Anno, Regula Pastoralis, Rerum Novarum, Sacred Tradition, Saint Ambrose, Saint Basil the Great, Saint Bede, Saint John Chrysostom, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, The Decretals, The New Theological Movement, Vatican II, Wealth |
Permalink
Posted by Tito Edwards
Sunday, June 27, 2010 \AM\.\Sun\.
Here are this past weeks Top-10 most visited Catholic posts from The American Catholic for June 20-26:
1. Parish Shopping by Michael Denton
2. McChrystal Should Be Fired by Donald R. McClarey
3. Sharia in Dearborn? by Donald R. McClarey
4. G.K. Chesterton on Lincoln by Donald R. McClarey
5. Healthcare Reform & the Magisterium by Chris Burgwald
6. Real Sex vs. the Contraceptive Mentality (Part 2) by Darwin
7. Toy Story 3 by Michael Denton
8. Planned Parenthood, What Happened to the Money? by D.R.M.
9. Under the Roman Sky by Donald R. McClarey
10. I Am Shocked, Shocked! by D.R. McClarey
Honorable Mentioned:
Top 25 Catholic Blogs by Technorati Authority by John Henry
4 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Best Catholic Blogs, Best Catholic Websites, Catholic Blog, Catholic Blog Sites, Catholic Blogs, Catholic Web Sites, Catholic Websites, Contraceptive Mentality, David Weigel, Health Care Reform, Magisterium, Michigan, Most Popular Catholic Blogs, Most Popular Catholic Websites, Planned Parenthood, Sex, Sharia, Stanley A. McChrystal, The American Catholic, Top Catholic Blogs, Top Catholic Websites, Toy Story 3, Under the Roman Sky, Washington Post |
Permalink
Posted by Tito Edwards
Saturday, June 19, 2010 \PM\.\Sat\.
In this spring’s debate over the healthcare bill, one of the disagreements that raised eyebrows most in Catholic circles was that between the US bishops conference and the Catholic Healthcare Association and other similar groups. The bishops claimed that the healthcare bill would lead to federal funding of abortions, while CHA et al. concluded that it would not.
In my opinion and that of numerous observers (including most of my fellow contributors here at TAC), the bishops were correct and CHA was horribly, terribly wrong.
There is another question, though… was CHA disobedient? That is, were they obliged as Catholics to accept the conclusions of the bishops conference? Was the activity of the bishops conference an act of their teaching charism which American Catholics were obliged to give their assent to?
Read the rest of this entry »
34 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Abortion, Catholic Bishops, Catholic Health Association, Government-Funded Abortion, Health Care Reform, Magisterium, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops |
Permalink
Posted by Chris Burgwald
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 \AM\.\Wed\.
I read a comment[1] a few weeks ago on GetReligion.org attempting to explain why John Paul Stevens was the last Protestant in the U.S. Supreme Court which simply said that Catholics and Jews have a tradition of being immersed in law (Canon Law and Halakha respectively for Catholics and Jews as an example).
This struck me as interesting because at first glance it kind of makes sense.
Of course there is much more to why the current make-up of the U.S. Supreme Court, 6 Catholics, 2 Jews, and an Episcopalian, is as it is.[2]
But I thought it was an interesting enough topic to dive into.
Lisa Wangsness of the Boston Globe chimes in with her two cents worth [emphases mine]:
Evangelical Protestants have been slow to embrace, or to feel welcomed by, the elite law schools like Harvard and Yale that have become a veritable requirement for Supreme Court nominees. One reason for this, some scholars say, is because of an anti-intellectual strain within evangelicalism.
As Ronald Reagan would say, there you go again, pushing the liberal theory that Christians are stupid (at least Evangelical Protestants).
Lets get beyond these stereotypes done by liberals to Christians.
Read the rest of this entry »
47 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: 613 Mitzvot, Canon Law, Catholic Customs and Traditions, Catholic Intellectual Tradition, Elena Kagan, Evangelical Protestants, Halakha, Holy Bible, Intellectualism, Jewish Customs and Traditions, Jewish Intellectual Tradition, Jewish Law, John Paul Stevens, Judaism, Law, Magisterium, Mishnah, Mosaic Law, Noahide Laws, Protestantism, Religion, Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, Sanhedrin, Scholasticism, SCOTUS, Sola Scriptura, Talmudic Law, U.S. Supreme Court |
Permalink
Posted by Tito Edwards
Wednesday, January 20, 2010 \AM\.\Wed\.
Throughout the last few years and specifically the last decade or so, the voluminous number of kooky quotes and statements coming from religious believers (heterodox Catholics included) and non believers alike is mind boggling. It can’t but help push the reasonable minded into the Catholic Church. Most casual observers are familiar with the number of high profile converts and reverts to the Catholic Church in the last 25 years or so. They range from theological luminaries like Dr Scott Hahn and Dr Francis Beckwith to political figures like Deal Hudson, Laura Ingraham and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. Many like them have come to the Church after years of study and reason, but many also have come to the Church after years of seeing their particular religious denomination become unrecognizable.
The latest world calamity has given us two examples of sheer kookery coming from a religious leader and a secular voice. After the horrific earthquake that left the western world’s most impoverished nation in tatters, the Reverend Pat Robertson chimed in with a quote that was not only tragically insensitive but historically inaccurate. The onetime presidential candidate (who actually came in second in the 1988 GOP Iowa Caucus) and a leading voice of the Evangelical world blamed the earthquake on Voodoo, a cult that sadly far too many people practice in Haiti. Robertson voiced his opinion on his popular 700 Club television program. Robertson repeated the fundamentalist canard that in the early 1800s the leaders of a slave revolt fighting against French colonial forces forged a pact with the Satan to thrown off the chains of their oppressors.
Read the rest of this entry »
12 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: America Magazine, Anglican Communion, Anglicanism, Anglicanorum Cœtibus, Archdiocese of Denver, Archdiocese of Los Angeles, Book of Genesis, Calvinism, Catholic Church, Catholic Converts, Catholic Orthodoxy, Catholicism, David Burton, Deal Hudson, Dean Fisher, Diocese of Lincoln, Diocese of Omaha, Diocese of Rochester, Dissident Theology, Early Church Fathers, Edward Campion Award, Evangelical Protestants, Francis Beckwith, Gene Robinson, Haiti, Holy Bible, Holy Gospel of Saint Luke, Holy Spirit, Homosexuality, Jesuits, Liberal Catholicism, Liberalism, Magisterium, Newt Gingrich, Pat Robertson, Rick Warren, Rowan Williams, Sacred Tradition, Saddleback Church, Scott Hahn, Society of Jesus, Unitarianism, Voodoo |
Permalink
Posted by Dave Hartline
Friday, January 15, 2010 \AM\.\Fri\.

Archbishop George H. Niederauer of San Francisco addressed on January 13, 2010 a free will defense of abortion by Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House:
In a recent interview with Eleanor Clift in Newsweek magazine (Dec. 21, 2009), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was asked about her disagreements with the United States Catholic bishops concerning Church teaching. Speaker Pelosi replied, in part: “I practically mourn this difference of opinion because I feel what I was raised to believe is consistent with what I profess, and that we are all endowed with a free will and a responsibility to answer for our actions. And that women should have the opportunity to exercise their free will.”
Embodied in that statement are some fundamental misconceptions about Catholic teaching on human freedom. These misconceptions are widespread both within the Catholic community and beyond. For this reason I believe it is important for me as Archbishop of San Francisco to make clear what the Catholic Church teaches about free will, conscience, and moral choice.
Catholic teaching on free will recognizes that God has given men and women the capacity to choose good or evil in their lives. The bishops at the Second Vatican Council declared that the human person, endowed with freedom, is “an outstanding manifestation of the divine image.” (Gaudium et Spes, No. 17) As the parable of the Grand Inquisitor in Dostoevsky’s novel, The Brothers Karamazov, makes so beautifully clear, God did not want humanity to be mere automatons, but to have the dignity of freedom, even recognizing that with that freedom comes the cost of many evil choices.
Read the rest of this entry »
5 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Archbishop George H. Niederauer, Catechism of the Catholic Church, Catholic Teaching, Catholics in Political Life, Catholics in Public Life, Christian Morality, Conscience, Education of Conscience, Eleanor Clift, Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Galatians, Epistle of Saint Paul to the Romans, Examination of Conscience, Father John Zuhlsdorf, Free Will, Freedom, Gaudium et Spes, God, Grace of God, Holy Bible, Human Freedom, Law Inscribed by God, Magisterium, Moral Choice, Moral Quality, Moral Responsibility, Moral Right, Nancy Pelosi, Newsweek, Prayer, Pro-Abortion, Reason, Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, Saint Basil the Great, Second Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Corinthians, U.S. Bishops, Vatican II |
Permalink
Posted by Donald R. McClarey
Friday, January 8, 2010 \AM\.\Fri\.
Last week I posted a reaction to House Speaker Pelosi’s interview in Newsweek (cross-posted to First Things‘ “First Thoughts”). Perusing the comments, I discovered that the author of No Hidden Magenta — a blog with the daunting task of “bridging the gap between ‘Red and Blue State’ groupthink” — has responded with fury and dismay:
At least one reason why neither the Pope nor the Archbishop have denied Pelosi Holy Communion–despite having ample opportunity to do so–is because prudential judgments about how best to reflect a moral principle in public policy involved technical considerations of practical reason that do not go to the heart of what it means to be a Roman Catholic; in other words, they are not about the central value at stake. If Speaker Pelosi believes that abortion is a positive good that should be promoted by the state (rather than as a privacy right for all women) that is one thing (and her recent actions with regard to Stupak suggest that she doesn’t think this), but there are any number of good reasons for supporting less-than-perfect public policy as she claims to be doing in trying to reduce the number of abortions while not supporting an abortion ban. …
Now, we can and should have debate about this question–and I think Pelosi is profoundly mistaken in her position on public policy–but let’s be clear: both the Pope and her Archbishop do not think such a position puts her status as a Roman Catholic or as a communicant in jeopardy. And those who think it does would do well to follow their example in distinguishing between ‘moral principle’ and ‘public policy.’
I’m relieved that the author believes Pelosi is “profoundly mistaken” in her position on public policy. I’m less convinced, however, that “the Pope and her Archbishop do not think such a position puts her status as a Roman Catholic or as a communicant in jeopardy”, and the author’s explanation for why they allegedly do not think so.
Read the rest of this entry »
6 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Archbishop Donald Wuerl, Archbishop George H. Niederauer, Canon 915, Catholics in Political Life, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Evangelium Vitae, Excommunication, Grave Moral Evil, Holy Eucharist, Magisterium, Manifest Grave Sin, Nancy Pelosi, NARAL, Pope Benedict XVI, Pope John Paul II, Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, Prudential Judgment, Reception of Holy Communion, The Participation of Catholics in Political Life, Voting Record on Abortion |
Permalink
Posted by Christopher Blosser
Monday, September 7, 2009 \AM\.\Mon\.
I attended a Lutheran (ELCA) college, where I majored in theology and philosophy. Much of my junior and senior year, however, were spent engaged in study of Catholic teaching (thanks to the fortunate discovery of Dorothy Day and Cardinal Ratzinger), culminating in my conversion.
In much the same manner as my familial background leads me, even as a convert, to take an interest in Mennonite affairs, I try to stay abreast of Lutheran matters and Lutheran-Catholic relations.
News of late has made for rather grim reading.
Read the rest of this entry »
12 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Magisterium, Protestantism, Sola Scriptura |
Permalink
Posted by Christopher Blosser
Wednesday, June 10, 2009 \AM\.\Wed\.
My comments regarding the importance of basing our civil society upon bedrock natural law principles, rather than positivist/originalist theories, drew some fire. I respond here with a fresh entry with relevant quotes from the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church regarding the natural law’s role in building up our legal system.
Read the rest of this entry »
16 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Archbishop Charles Chaput, Bishop Thomas Wenski, Catholic Social Teaching, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, Magisterium, Natural Law |
Permalink
Posted by Tim Shipe
Wednesday, May 20, 2009 \AM\.\Wed\.
On the Ordination of Women, Pt. I
The Catholic Church in the modern world has faced numerous petitions to alter her doctrine in regard to several theological and moral matters. The ordination of women is amongst such petitions, particularly after the Second Vatican Council. Several Protestant religious traditions have authorized women ministers and preachers. Many churches in the Anglican Communion already permit women to serve at the altar. The Catholic Church is virtually alone, with the sole exception of the Eastern Orthodox, in her commitment to an exclusively male priesthood. Despite these realities, the late Holy Father, Pope John Paul II solemnly declared in his apostolic letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis “…the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful.” Despite the Holy Father’s attempt to reaffirm the Church’s tradition of male-only priests, the question, at least in debate, still remains. Despite the sincerity of advocates for conferring the sacrament of ministerial priesthood on women, theologically and doctrinally it is impossible. Cardinal Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI) too has reiterated that the church teaching regarding women’s ordination is “founded on the written Word of God, and from the beginning constantly preserved and applied in the Tradition of the Church, it has been set forth infallibly by the ordinary and universal Magisterium.”
Read the rest of this entry »
106 Comments |
Uncategorized | Tagged: C.S. Lewis, Catholic Church, Christianity, Deborah Halter, Divine Revelation, Holy Orders, Holy Spirit, Jesus Christ, Letter to the Hebrews, Magisterium, Old Testament, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, Phenomenology, Pope John Paul II, Priesthood, Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, Saint Benedicta of the Cross, Sister Sara Butler, Thomism |
Permalink
Posted by Eric Brown